French alpine viaducts – the old and the new

French alpine viaducts – the old and the new

The A40 motorway in southern France is a busy highway through the mountains that provides the most direct route from Geneva to the mountain resort of Chamonix and surrounding towns. Together with a railways along a similar route, they are used all year round by both French and international tourists and local people; the area is famous for skiing, mountain hiking, climbing and local French culture – so the roads and railways along this route are essential.

Two prominent and impressive viaducts caught my eye as I drove down the motorway. For each, I sketched a front-on, fine-lined shape and a more visual sketch of what the bridges actually look like when you’re driving on the road.

First, a modern, slender concrete structure – the Viaduc des Egratz de Passy. This one is part of the westbound A40 motorway.

^ see the column cross sections at the bottom of the drawing

Viaduc des Egratz de Passy, 1981 (road)

  • The (presumably reinforced) concrete posts are generally rectangular, with their short side aligned with the length of the motorway, with one exception. The column on the right of the drawing above is hexagonal instead – the reason is not clear, but it may be required because of the harsh bend at that point on the structure.
  • The deck does not appear to be simply fixed straight on to the columns – at a glance, it looks like it is levitating slightly. This is probably because of the damping system between the deck and the columns. Allowing some small damped rocking, rather than rigidly fixing the two together, helps the structure deal with the vibrations of the road without sudden plastic collapse or fast fracture of the joints.

Second, a more traditional, heavier-weight arch design – clearly from a much older era – the Viaduc de Saint-Marie.

Viaduc de Saint-Marie, opening date unclear (rail)

  • Straight, sturdy columns form the bottom section. Semi-circular arches have been utilised for structural stability in the top section.
  • The main material is masonry – probably stone masonry by observation.
  • Arch bridges are excellent at dealing with the continuous vibrations of railway traffic without the need for external damping systems (which were likley not developed at the time of construction).
  • The project would have been advanced for its time, fitting in with such an uncertain landscape – not to mention massively expensive as it would have been build by human power alone. Impressive!
Comments are closed.